Skip to main content

9 posts tagged with "performance"

performance tag description

View All Tags

emoji.demojize() vs. clean-text Performance Comparison

· 6 min read
Serhii Hrekov
software engineer, creator, artist, programmer, projects founder

Performance Showdown: emoji.demojize() vs. clean-text for Emoji Handling

When choosing a library for high-throughput text preprocessing, performance is often as important as accuracy. Both the emoji library's demojize() function and the comprehensive clean-text library can remove or replace emojis, but they serve different purposes, which impacts their speed and efficiency.

Since no direct, widely-published benchmark comparing only these two specific functions exists, this analysis focuses on their architectural differences and their respective performance profiles, based on typical NLP use cases.

Benchmarking Dataclasses, Named Tuples, and Pydantic Models: Choosing the Right Python Data Structure

· 7 min read
Serhii Hrekov
software engineer, creator, artist, programmer, projects founder

When structuring immutable, simple data in Python, developers often choose between several tools. While Dataclasses and Pydantic models dominate modern usage, older structures like namedtuple and simpler tools like tuple and dict still have niche uses.

This article compares these common data structures based on their primary function, mutability, and performance characteristics to help you choose the best tool for the job.

Pydantic vs. Dataclasses speed comparison

· 6 min read
Serhii Hrekov
software engineer, creator, artist, programmer, projects founder

While both Pydantic models and Python dataclasses serve to structure data, their performance characteristics are significantly different. The key distinction lies in when and how validation occurs. Dataclasses rely on simple Python object initialization, while Pydantic executes a comprehensive validation and coercion pipeline on every instantiation.

The clear winner in terms of raw execution speed is the Python Dataclass.

How Fast is Typeguard(Performance Benchmarks)

· 6 min read
Serhii Hrekov
software engineer, creator, artist, programmer, projects founder

⚡ How Fast is Typeguard? Performance Benchmarks and Analysis

Understanding the speed of Typeguard is essential when integrating it into performance-critical Python applications. Since Typeguard performs runtime reflection and checking, it inevitably adds overhead. However, the time added is typically measured in microseconds (µs), making it extremely fast for single invocations.

The key factors determining the speed are the complexity of the type signature and the size of the data structure being checked.

Analyzing Typeguard Overhead in High-Frequency Invocation

· 7 min read
Serhii Hrekov
software engineer, creator, artist, programmer, projects founder

When Typeguard is used in scenarios where functions are invoked thousands of times per request (e.g., in tight loops or high-frequency processing), understanding the cumulative performance impact is essential. This article delves into how invocation frequency and type signature complexity influence Typeguard's overhead and offers strategies to mitigate performance hits while maintaining type safety.

Python Typeguard Performance Considerations for Database I/O Wrappers

· 6 min read
Serhii Hrekov
software engineer, creator, artist, programmer, projects founder

When implementing runtime checks like Typeguard, the primary concern is the performance overhead it adds to production code, especially in high-throughput applications that rely on fast I/O operations (like database queries).

The short answer is: Typeguard adds a measurable execution overhead, but it is often negligible compared to the time spent on I/O (Database operations).

Here is a breakdown of the performance implications and when you should be concerned.

Benchmark: msgspec vs. Pydantic v2

· 5 min read
Serhii Hrekov
software engineer, creator, artist, programmer, projects founder

msgspec is an extremely fast serialization and validation library that consistently outperforms Pydantic v2 in benchmarks. This performance advantage comes from its design as a lean, compiled-code-based library focused on a narrow set of data handling tasks, whereas Pydantic v2 is a feature-rich framework.

The performance differences are most pronounced in two key areas: parsing/decoding (converting data like JSON into Python objects) and serialization/encoding (converting Python objects into data like JSON).

How to Measure Execution Time of a Function in Python (With Examples)

· 6 min read
Serhii Hrekov
software engineer, creator, artist, programmer, projects founder

Measuring how long your Python code takes to run is a critical skill for performance optimization, profiling, or benchmarking different approaches to solving a problem. Python offers many tools for tracking the execution time of a function - from simple built-in methods to full-blown profilers.

In this guide, we will explore multiple methods with code examples to help you choose the right one for your use case.

Best Practices for Using msgspec in Python for High-Performance Serialization

· 5 min read
Serhii Hrekov
software engineer, creator, artist, programmer, projects founder

msgspec is a high-performance serialization library designed for modern Python applications. It combines type-safe data modeling, blazing-fast parsing, and flexible support for multiple serialization formats, including MessagePack, JSON, and TOML.

This article outlines the best practices for integrating msgspec into your codebase. It provides a practical, performance-oriented guide to writing cleaner, safer, and faster Python services.