Here are detailed answers and a guide on how Supabase's Real-time, Auth, and RLS policies work together to secure your application.

The Advanced Supabase Guide: Database Features, Multi-Tenancy, and Scalability​

This guide delves into the advanced functionality of Supabase, exploring database features, security, and best practices for building robust, scalable applications.

An In-Depth Guide to Supabase: Architecture, Scalability, and Production Readiness​

As a developer, choosing a backend platform is a critical decision that impacts everything from data modeling to scalability and security. Supabase, the open-source Firebase alternative, has gained significant traction. This guide will provide an in-depth analysis of Supabase, answering key questions about its architecture, scalability, and suitability for production applications.

Rebasing in Git is a powerful and often misunderstood tool. While its primary use is to integrate changes from one branch onto another, there are several "unusual" yet highly effective ways to leverage git rebase to clean up your commit history, fix mistakes, and collaborate more smoothly.

This guide explores some of these advanced use cases, focusing on their practical application and best practices.

In Git, the terms ours and theirs are used to refer to the two conflicting versions of a file during a merge or rebase. Understanding which version is which is critical for resolving conflicts correctly [1].

Replacing one Git branch with another is a destructive operation that rewrites the history of the target branch. The method you provided using git merge -s ours is a clever and safe way to achieve this without a hard reset. This guide will walk you through the process, explain the commands, and provide a clear, step-by-step example.

Rebasing is not recommended in two primary situations: when you are working on a public or shared branch and when the rebase operation would cause a significant loss of historical context.

How to Undo a Git Rebase​

Undoing a git rebase is a common task, especially if you've made a mistake or the rebase process introduced unexpected issues. The method you use depends on the state of your repository and whether you've pushed the changes to a remote repository.

Is rebase better than merge?​

Neither rebase nor merge is inherently "better"; they are different tools used for different purposes in Git. The choice between them depends on your workflow, your team's preferences, and whether you want a clean, linear history or an accurate, chronological record of events (3).

Rebasing a local branch onto a remote branch is a common workflow for keeping your feature branch up-to-date with the main development branch (like main or master) and maintaining a clean, linear commit history.

The process involves a few key steps: fetching the latest changes, checking out your local branch, performing the rebase, handling conflicts, and then force-pushing your changes if the branch was already shared.